English Compriheshion
Autor: Sharon • November 20, 2018 • 3,331 Words (14 Pages) • 2,091 Views
...
The current education has changed to a great extent. It is, whether we admit it or not, influenced by various external factors including (but not limited to) geopolitics, global security, media and digital technologies, art and culture, the environment and even religion.
In the past few years, these factors have gained more importance than ever before, but does this importance reflect our schooling and education?
Take the example of art – we still force our children to paint the sky blue, when children from urban areas hardly see the blue sky. This is just a petty example of how we’re unable to evolve our education system.
Having said that, it’s a fact that the foremost step towards solving a problem is to admit that there is one. It’s about time we admit to ourselves that our education system is utterly out-dated. We now need to start talking about developing the schools of tomorrow.
Hence, School of Tomorrow International Education and Cultural Festival taking place in Karachi on November 28th and 29th is an effort towards understanding the flaws we have in our current educational system. We need to explore the challenges that the education sector can face in the future, and prepare accordingly. It is about time such efforts taking place and the reasons stated above show just how much we need to support and appreciate these things. I, for one, am truly looking forward to this event and hope that my generation sees the importance of attending it too.
Q1. There are many schools in Pakistan, where education hardly exists BECAUSE 2/
-
- Quality Education is missing
-
Q2. All are the flaws of education system of Pakistan EXCEPT: 2/
-
- It supports Urdu medium of instructions
-
Q3. Our education system supports cramming. Do you agree? State your opinion.2/
Yes, there are too many kids in one class in ratio to the teacher which makes it hard to learn.
Q4. How can we improve our education system? Give your suggestions.2/
Allocate more funding for early education
Q5. Identify the antonym of Integration. 1/
-
- Separation
Q6. Identify the synonym of clichéd. 1/
-
- Old
Reading Comprehension-3
Read the passage carefully and answer the questions below
One of the modern world’s intriguing sources of mystery has been aeroplanes vanishing in mid-flight. One of the more famous of these was the disappearance in 1937 of a pioneer woman aviator, Amelia Earhart. On the second last stage of an attempted round the world flight, she had radioed her position as she and her navigator searched desperately for their destination, a tiny island in the Pacific.
The plane never arrived at Howland Island. Did it crash and sink after running out of fuel? It had been a long haul from New Guinea, a twenty hour flight covering some four thousand kilometres. Did Earhart have enough fuel to set down on some other island on her radioed course? Or did she end up somewhere else altogether? One fanciful theory had her being captured by the Japanese in the Marshall Islands and later executed as an American spy; another had her living out her days under an assumed name as a housewife in New Jersey.
Seventy years after Earhart’s disappearance, ‘myth busters’ continue to search for her. She was the best-known American woman pilot in the world. People were tracking her flight with great interest when, suddenly, she vanished into thin air. Aircraft had developed rapidly in sophistication after World War One, with the 1920s and 1930s marked by an aeronautical record-setting frenzy. Conquest of the air had become a global obsession. While Earhart was making headlines with her solo flights, other aviators like high-altitude pioneer Wiley Post and industrialist Howard Hughes were grabbing some glory of their own. But only Earhart, the reserved tomboy from Kansas who disappeared three weeks shy of her 40th birthday, still grips the public imagination. Her disappearance has been the subject of at least fifty books, countless magazine and newspaper articles, and TV documentaries. It is seen by journalists as the last great American mystery.
There are currently two main theories about Amelia Earhart’s fate.
There were reports of distress calls from the Phoenix Islands made on Earhart’s radio frequency for days after she vanished. Some say the plane could have broadcast only if it were on land, not in the water. The Coast Guard and later the Navy, believing the distress calls were real, adjusted their searches, and newspapers at the time reported Earhart and her navigator were marooned on an island. No-one was able to trace the calls at the time, so whether Earhart was on land in the Phoenix Islands or there was a hoaxer in the Phoenix Islands using her radio remains a mystery. Others dismiss the radio calls as bogus and insist Earhart and her navigator ditched in the water. An Earhart researcher, Elgen Long, claims that Earhart’s airplane ran out of gas within fifty-two miles of the island and is sitting somewhere in a 6,000-square-mile area, at a depth of 17,000 feet. At that depth, the fuselage would still be in shiny, pristine condition if ever anyone were able to locate it. It would not even be covered in a layer of silt. Those who subscribe to this explanation claim that fuel calculations, radio calls and other considerations all show that the plane plunged into the sea somewhere off Howland Island. Whatever the explanation, the prospect of finding the remains is unsettling to many. To recover skeletal remains or personal effects would be a grisly experience and an intrusion. They want to know where Amelia Earhart is, but that’s as far as they would like to go. As one investigator has put it, “I’m convinced that the mystery is part of what keeps us interested. In part, we remember her because she’s our favourite missing person.”
Q1. Amelia Earhart’s nationality was:
D:
...