Crowds and Politics
Autor: Maryam • June 28, 2018 • 2,545 Words (11 Pages) • 666 Views
...
it’s individuals. These emotions, passions and feelings can be called
“affects” to the extent that individuals of the crowds produce, transmit,
circulate, and receive them socially through physical contact or through
various media. The movement of affects through this socioeconomic
scale of production and distribution is interactive. These particular
affects can have a direct impact on the people outside the crowd as
well. The rise of these various emotions and feelings can increase the
levels of anxiety among the people in UP. So increase of media
activism, social media count campaigns, signature campaigns, etc., are
more likely to contribute in the long-term to the destabilization of
society, nation, economy and State. It’s quite a big chance to become a
fight for rights and privileges and suspension of the human rights of
other people, etc. Liberalism may go and also democracy as some
people want to force their ideas of policy onto silent others without any
real social consensus. It would be better if moderate minds doing their
job of bringing thoughtful change and that might not happen.Crowds and riots
There is only a slightest difference between the crowds and mobs.
Where crowd is a group of people whose members consist of individual
thoughts on the other hand a mob is a group of people with one
common thought. It is ultimately the crowds that could possibly and
eventually going to transform into a mob. For example we can have a
crowd gathered at a cricket match as soon as these group of people
decide to charge the field, they could eventually turn into a mob. So, in
some contexts it is no wrong to address the crowd as a mob. But
anyway it need not necessarily to be true that every crowd transforms
into a mob they might stay with their individual thoughts with getting
on to a common thought. Mob is an important form of acting crowd. It
is so appropriate to say that a mob is an emotionally aroused crowd
bent on violent action. Mobs have their own leaders and are single
minded in their aggressive intent. They impose strong conformity on
their members. Like any other crowd mob is particularly temporary and
un stable in character. The mob has its own limited but immediate
objectives and concentrates on its realization. The Purposive and Active
crowds (mobs) are the crowds that are deliberately planned by some
interested parties to achieve their own predeceased purpose. For
example, Opponents of a political leader purposefully attacking a big
rally; or leaders of the opposition and trade union leaders direct their
followers to attack government offices, public properties, etc. The
Confused and Random crowds(mobs) are not deliberately created, nor
there do any attempt in them on the part of the leaders to give
direction for their followers. Due to confusion a crowd may get
converged into a mob. For example a ferocious bull may, all of a
sudden, rush towards a big gathering of people who have assembled in
a field to listen to a political speech. Due to fear and confusion people
may become panicky. Some may consider it to be the handiwork of thepolitical opponents and may resort to violence in a bid to register their
protest against it. Sudden outbursts of people and unanticipated
communal disturbances, can also be cited here as examples.
On the other hand the Riot is another important aspect of crowd. It is a
violent and destructive collective outburst. A riot is the action of a
violently aggressive, destructive crowd. Rioting crowds and the mobs
might look alike in many aspects but they both are vividly different
from each other. Their behavior is less structured, purposive and
unified. On the other hand, the mob usually has some specific target —
lynching a victim attacking a police vehicle, burning down a foreign
embassy, ransacking the property of an anti national smuggler. It could
be said that riot involves behavior which has the main objective of
creating nothing but disorder. In a democratic country like India the
mobs and protests are quite common. Culturally unique features of the
protests and riots are bandhs (a version of a strike), hartals (a version of
a municipal shut-down), dharnas (a version of swarming). These strikes
are also the prominent features of the crowds. It’s these strikes that
keeps the crowds alive. The scope of expansion of the crowds also
depends on the intensity of these crowds. These strikes are the only
reason due to which we could be able to feel the excitement and the
energy of the crowds. No matter if we are directly present in the strikes
or watching it on the television. Even the audience of the
...