Essays.club - Get Free Essays and Term Papers
Search

French Stuff

Autor:   •  December 29, 2017  •  2,609 Words (11 Pages)  •  582 Views

Page 1 of 11

...

“[History] cannot be unlived, but if faced with courage, need not be lived again.” This statement highlighting the permanent nature of history has been shown to only partially valid in relation to Animal Farm. Though Orwell’s novella is not actual history, it is an allegorical representation of the Russian Revolution, giving it some relevance to the above statement. Through the use of characters with hazy memories, the crafting of Benjamin as a constant, and many cyclical features of the plot, Orwell is able to convey that history can be unlived, and will always be relived, no matter the courage it is faced with, criticizing the nature of history as a whole.

[pic 1]

Short(er) essay:

The statement that, “History, despite its wrenching pain, cannot be unlived, but if faced with courage, need not be lived again,” is to be considered in a purely historical context to mean that the past, no matter how painful, will not fade, but can stopped from recurring in the future, through acknowledging its existence and facing it with courage. In the context of George Orwell’s Animal Farm this statement shows itself to be only partially valid. However, it must be acknowledged that this novella is fiction and only approaches fact through its allegorical representation of the russian revolution, therefore, this statement is taken slightly out of context. Orwell illustrates the partial validity of the statement through the haziness of the memories of the animals in regard to times before and during the revolution, the use of the character Benjamin as a constant, and the near cyclical features of the main plotline combined with the gradual transformation from pig to man and from communist regime to tyranny.

In his novella, Animal Farm, Orwell crafts the animals of the the farm as forgetful and oblivious to deceit in order to convey that history can in fact be unlived. After Snowball's expulsion Napoleon needs to control the animals so he states that, “documents had been discovered which revealed further details about Snowball's complicity with Jones.” This by itself does not prove much about history being unlived, but does show history being altered. However, Orwell’s next sentence, “It now appeared that Snowball had not, as the animals had previously imagined, merely attempted to lose the Battle of the Cowshed… but had been openly fighting on Jones's side.” This passage is carefully crafted to show that the leaked documents directly influenced what the animal’s remembered of the past, causing them to unlive the true past. This is seen primarily in the phrase, “as the animals had previously imagined” where the animals as a group are shown to have discredited the past by using the word “imagined.” This is parallel event in the novel is parallel to Vyacheslav Molotov, Russian media, and propaganda during the Russian revolution, to which the statement,”history cannot be unlived” is relevant.Through the animals forgetting the events and ideals of the past, both during and before their lifetimes, Orwell shows that history can in fact be unlived by a group through members who are forgetful and oblivious to deceit. However some, such as Benjamin,are able to see through this deception, and can recall life as it was before.

By using Benjamin as a constant, a metaphorical yardstick held up against the plotline, Orwell is able to portray the idea of nothing ever changing permanently, and new ways falling back into old ways, showing that history will always be re-lived, even if faced with courage and optimism, as it was initially in Animal Farm. Orwell crafts Benjamin as a constant in many passages placed strategically throughout the text. Orwell writes that after the rebellion, Benjamin, “seemed quite unchanged.” On top of that, Benjamin is often overheard saying that,"Donkeys live a long time,” showing that he will live through all of the events described in the novel, and remain constant. Benjamin’s description of lack of change being, “unalterable law of life,” also reflects his constant nature. There are two points in the novel when Benjamin’s mood reflects the general situation. The first: the farm under Jones’ rule. The second is preceded by the pigs’ gradual transformation from pig to man. This is during the pigs’ tyrannous rule that we assume followed the events described in the novel. These two points act as markers in the text. By the first, the reader most likely sees how the situation reflects Benjamin’s attitude, but less and less so until the plot reaches its climax. Once the reader reaches this second intersection, knowing that Benjamin’s attitude remains constant, he/she can see that the situation has become very similar to the situation during the first point, highlighting the fact that nothing has changed, that nothing will change, that history will always be relived. Through crafting Benjamin as a character with a constant mood and opinion, alive throughout the whole of the novella Orwell manages to highlight the other animals’ deception as well as the fact that history always returns to be relived. While the use of Benjamin allows the reader to more clearly see the animal’s deception, Benjamin’s lack of courage hinders the animals from seeing the same.

In the statement, “History cannot be unlived, but if faced with courage, need not be lived again,” there is no specification on whose courage is needed to stop historical themes and patterns. In Animal Farm, the past is faced with cowardice by many of the animals but with courage and assertiveness by the pigs. Orwell uses the pigs’ courage, combined with their gradual transformation from pig to man, communist to tyrant to reveal that even with courage, society always returns to the same, or a similar, state. In the novel, history is faced by with courage by the pigs and they eliminate the threat it poses. This is achieved through its alteration such as the alteration of Snowball’s supposed role in the battle of the cowshed, as mentioned in the paragraph above. This change in history hinders the animals from seeing the issues with the current regime that had been issues pointed out in the previous regime. This forces them to relive history, disproving the second part of the statement: “but if faced with courage, need not be lived again.[(history)].” This is again reinforced by some of the cyclical features of the plot, for example, the use of alcohol. At the beginning of the novel, Mr. Jones, leader of the farm, is ““too drunk to remember to close the popholes,” and by the end, the pigs “Fill [their] glasses to the brim.” This passage a portrays the Benjamin’s unalterable law: that society always returns to its previous state almost as if

...

Download:   txt (15.7 Kb)   pdf (55.4 Kb)   docx (13.4 Kb)  
Continue for 10 more pages »
Only available on Essays.club