Song in Caucasian Chalk Circle Reflect Our Human Life

...

Moreover, the song has a thought of dispute arose when the governor was overthrown and everyone ran for their safety Natella Abashwili chose her son Michael's material things.Grouchas and Michael fled to the northern mountains, for which he sacrificed a lot. The dispute was settled in court, and judge Azdak must pass the verdict. Draw a circle of chalk on the ground. Michael is placed in the center. The plaintiff Natella Abashwili and the defendant Grusha Vashnadze walked into the circle. Everyone can get the child in one hand, and the real child's mother is the person who pulled him out of the circle. Grusha let us go.They were told to pull the child two times because she claimed that she could not pull him apart and pulled him up.After that ,Grusha felt that sadness and heartbroken.

On the other hands,this songs have a sense of Grusha's determination and selflessness, trying to save Michael's life.This song gives the reader or audience sympathy for Grusha and laughs at her boldness.

Conclusion

In conclusion,both of two songs have the same literary devices and same meaning,but the thought in two songs have something difference.One is worried,the other one is sadness.The two songs are using that anaphora to establish the strong and indignant atmosphere so that it can present with the readers how strongly emotion she are.At the same time,The two songs are talking about humans do not know how to cherish our lives. When our life loses it, so that we only know it, it seems too late.

_ _ _

Reference List

Abbott, A. (1989). The Vital Lie. Reality and Illusion in Modern Drama. Tuscaloosa,

London: U of Alabama Press.

Anderson, Joseph D. (1996). The Reality of Illusion: An Ecological Approach to

Cognitive Film Theory. Southern Illinois UP.

Aristotle (1982). Poetik. Stuttgart: Reclam.

Beecher, Donald (2006). ‘Mind, Theaters, and the Anatomy of Consciousness’,

Philosophy and Literature, 30, p. 1–16.Bentley, Eric (1946). Playwright as Thinker. New York: Meridian.

Blair, Rhonda (2008). The Actor, Image, and Action: Acting and Cognitive

Neuroscience. London: Routledge.

Bosco, Francesca, Friedman, Ori and Leslie, Alan (2006). ‘Recognition of pretend and

real actions in play by 1- and 2-year-olds: Early success and why they fail’, Cognitive Development 21, p. 3–10.

Brandt, Aage (2004). Spaces, Domains and Meaning: Essays in Cognitive Semiotics,

European Semiotics Series No. 4. Bern: Lang.

Brandt, Line and Brandt, Per Aage (2005). ‘Making Sense of a Blend – A

Cognitive-semiotic Approach to Metaphor’. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3.

Brecht, Brecht ([1967]). The Caucasian Chalk Circle (CCC), New York: Grove.

Brecht, Brecht (1963). Bertolt Brecht Schriften zum Theater (SzT), Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Brecht, Brecht SzT1 (1918–1935) ‘Betrachtung über die Schwierigkeiten des epischen,Theaters’, 184–6.

Brecht, Brecht SzT2 (1918–1933). ‘Über das Unterhaltungsdrama’, p. 7f.

Brecht, Brecht SzT3 (1933–1947). ‘Kritik der Einfühlung’, p. 22–37.

Brecht, Brecht SzT5 (1933–1951). ‘Der Messingkauf’, p. 9–182.

Brecht, Brecht SzT7 (1948–1956). ‘Kleines Organon für das Theater’, p. 7–67.

Brecht, Brecht (1990). Brecht on Theatre: The Development of an Aesthetic, edited and translated by John Willett, London: Methuen.

Brecht, Brecht (1991). ‘Zu Der kaukasische Kreidekreis’, Brecht, Werke 24, p. 341–48.

Brown, Arthur (1960). ‘The Play within a Play: An Elizabethan Dramatic Device’, English

Association Essays and Studies 13, p. 36–48.

Cook, Amy (2006). ‘Staging Nothing: Hamlet and Cognitive Science’, SubStance 35.2. p.

83–99. Coulson, Seana (2001). Semantic Leaps: Frame-shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning

Construction. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Coulson, Seana (2006). Conceptual Blending in Thought, Rhetoric, and Ideology. In Kristiansen, G. &

Dirven, R. eds. (2006), Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives.

Amsterdam: John H. Benjamins, p. 187–210.

Currie, Gregory and Ravenscroft, Ian (2002). Recreative Minds: Imagination in Philosophy and Psychology. New York: Oxford UP.

Deigh, John (1994) ‘Cognitivism in the Theory of Emotions’, Ethics 104.4: 824–54.

Dickson, Keith A. (1978). Towards Utopia: A Study of Brecht. Oxford: Clarendon.

Fauconnier, Gilles (2000). ‘Conceptual blending’, in Smelser, N. and P. Baltes, editors.

International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Maryland Heights, MO:Elsevier, p. 2495–2498.

Fauconnier, Gilles and Turner, Mark (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic.

Fauconnier, Gilles and Turner, Mark (2008). ‘The origin of language as a product of the

evolution of double-scope blending’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31.5, p. 520–521. Gardner, Howard (1985). The Mind’s New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution. New York:Basic.

Gobert, R. Darren (2006). ‘Cognitive Catharsis in The Caucasian Chalk Circle’, Modern Drama.49.1.

Gordon,