Dmd Individual Assignment
Autor: Adnan • December 4, 2017 • 1,703 Words (7 Pages) • 559 Views
...
Object.
Altern.
PROFESSIONAL
PERSONAL
Balance
Security & Safety
Learning
Quality of Life
1 - China
0
0
Medium
0
0
2 - Spain
+10%
+25%
0
+50%
+5%
3 - Brazil
+40%
-25%
Great
+25%
-15%
Next I went for leveling the personal-Learning objective for all alternatives, I increased the Security and Safety objectives by 15% for each level of learning trade-off therefore increasing the Security & Safety for:
- Alternative 1 => lowering from “medium” to “0” the learning objective => 1 level => 15% on Security & Safety.
- Alternative 3 => lowering from “great” to “0” the learning objective => 2 levels => 30% on Security & Safety.
Object.
Altern.
PROFESSIONAL
PERSONAL
Balance
Security & Safety
Learning
Quality of Life
1 - China
0
+15% (0)
0 (medium)
0
0
2 - Spain
+10%
+25%
0
+50%
+5%
3 - Brazil
+40%
+5% (-25%)
0 (great)
+25%
-15%
As a consequence of the leveling of the Personal-Learning objective it was removed not having any more influence because all alternatives have the same score.
Object.
Altern.
PROFESSIONAL
PERSONAL
Balance
Security & Safety
Learning[pic 1][pic 2]
Quality of Life
1 - China
0
+15% (0)
0 (medium)
0
0
2 - Spain
+10%
+25%
0
+50%
+5%
3 - Brazil
+40%
+5% (-25%)
0 (great)
+25%
-15%
This also produces that Alternative 1 – China has a lower score than Alternative 2 – Spain in all categories and therefore is discarded, leaving “alive” only 2 alternatives.
Object.
Altern.
PROFESSIONAL
PERSONAL
Balance
Security & Safety
Quality of Life
1 - China[pic 3]
0
+15%
0
0
2 - Spain
+10%
+25%
+50%
+5%
3 - Brazil
+40%
+5%
+25%
-15%
The next even-swap step was to balance the Professional objective. I consider that increasing up to the same level this objective can be balanced by reducing 15% on Security & Safety as well as in Quality of Life from Alternative 2 – Spain.
Object.
Altern.
PROFESSIONAL[pic 4][pic 5]
PERSONAL
Balance
Security & Safety
Quality of Life
2 - Spain
+40% (+10%)
+10% (+25%)
...