Why Did the Industrial Revolution Begin in England in the Middle of the 18th Century?
Autor: Sharon • January 16, 2018 • 728 Words (3 Pages) • 761 Views
...
and geographical basis to Max Weber’s linkage of Protestant ethic to capitalist predisposition. It also provides genetic explanations for the previously mentioned precursors for industrial productivity like better physical-cognitive abilities of workers and ‘good’ responses to capitalist incentives such as work intensification .
From the demand side, the British labor force was drawn from a population with a comparatively high disposable income and consumption levels well above agricultural subsistence exhibited by most Asian or Southern European countries. The increased consumer aspiration behind individuated choice also meant a growing appetite for durable goods resulted in increased engagement in the workforce and a shift of the narrative from production to consumption. Close economic stratification of British society also meant a certain collective agency in determining the markets for goods and products, as primary decision-making focus shifted from the firm to an economically empowered individual or household. In addition to less pervasive income inequality and better access to fashion-sensitive or higher quality goods, the English also displayed a conspicuous abundance of women and children on the factory floor, demonstrating a broadened and empowered consumer base and the pioneering character of the new market-responsive British workforce.
To the last part of our question, it might be difficult to ascribe the Industrial Revolution’s 18th century timing solely to the long-evolving exceptionalism of British labor, especially when the Revolution is misleadingly portrayed with a precipitous technological and imperialist impetus. A more ‘gradualist’ counterpoint posits that the Revolution was nothing more than a slow growth of industrial output against the backdrop of steady structural labor realignment from agrarian to non-agrarian occupations . In the absence of the big macroeconomic indicators of a tumultuous economic revolution, this hypothesis supports our attentiveness to structural changes in the English labor force when exposed to market forces.
...