Campar Industries Case Study
Autor: Sharon • April 27, 2018 • 1,179 Words (5 Pages) • 922 Views
...
Gross margin variances
Budgeted unit margin, A = $300 - ($72 + $62.50 + $75) = $90.50
Budgeted unit margin, B = $185 - ($54 + $37.50 + $45) = $48.50
Actual unit margin, A = ($533750/1750) - $209.50 = $95.50
Actual unit margin, B = ($601250/3250) - $136.50 = $48.50
Unit margin variance
For A: ($95.50 - $90.50)*1750 = $8750
For B: ($48.50 - $48.50)*3250 = $0
Total unit margin variance = $8750
Mix variance
For A: (1750- 1900)*$90.50 = -$13575
For B: (3250-3100)*$48.50 = $7275
Total mix variance = -$6300
Net margin variance = -$6300 + $8750 = $2450.
Material variances
Standard materials per unit, A: $72 at $1.80 per lb = 40 lbs.
Standard materials per unit, B: $54 at $1.80 per lb = 30 lbs.
Price variance: ($1.80 – ($330480/180000))*180000 = ($1.80 - $1.836)*180000
= (-$0.036)*180000 = -$6480.
Usage variance: ((1800*40) + (3300*30) – 180000)*$1.80
= (72000 + 99000 - 180000)*1.80 = -9000*$1.80 = -$16200.
Net material variance = -$6480 + (-$16200) = -$22680
Labor variances
A: Standard labor per unit: $62.50/$25/hr = 2.5 hrs.
B: Standard labor per unit: $37.50/$25/hr = 1.5 hrs.
Labor efficiency variance: ((1800*2.5) + (3300*1.5) – 9450)*$25 = (4500 + 4950 - 9450)*$25 = 0*$25 = $0.
Rate variance = ($25 – ($233880/9450))*9450 = ($25 - $24.75)*9450 = $2362.50
Net labor variance = Rate variance + Labor efficiency variance = $2362.50 + $0 = $2362.50
Overhead variances
Spending variance = $94000 + ($0.80*233880) - $320000 = -$38896
Volume variance = ($1.20*233880) – ($32000 - $38896) = $280656 - $281104 = -$448
Net overhead variance = -$38896 - $448 = -$39344.
Profit variance
= Net margin variance + Net material variance + Net labor variance + Net overhead variance = $2450 + (-$22680) + 2362.50 + (-$39344) = -57211.50
Summary of gross margin for Delta division
Budgeted margin
Revenue, Budgeted: (1900*$300) + (3100*$185) = $570000 + $573500 = $1143500
Cost of goods sold at standard = $821200
Gross margin, standard = $1143500 - $821200 = $322300
Production cost variances = Nil
Gross margin, Actual = $322300.
Actual margin
Revenue, Actual: $533750 + $601250 = $1135000
Cost of goods sold at standard = $810250
Gross margin, standard = $1135000 - $810250 = $324750
Production cost variances
Materials usage = -$16200
Materials price = -$6480
Labor rate = $2362.50
Overhead spending = -$38896
Overhead volume = -$448
Gross margin, Actual = $265088.50
Discussion
In delta division, due to the higher margin of Product A, the standard gross margin has increased by $8750. But there is an offset of this figure due to a shift in product mix of the lower margin Product B. Standard overhead cost per unit has been underestimated due to a sale volume presumption at 23500 DL$ but the actual volume is a bit less at 233880 DL$. Except the labor rate variance all other production variances are unfavorable.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Conclusion
Except the Alpha division all the other 3 divisions have issues and not profitable according to the variance analysis. It is highly recommended to correct the potential issues causing the overall unfavorable variances and turn the divisions to the path of profits.
References:
Anthony. (05/2010). Accounting: Texts and Cases, 13th Edition. [VitalSource Bookshelf Online]. Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/#/books/1259302172/
Accounting-Simplified.com Retrieved from http://accounting-simplified.com/management/variance-analysis/material/mix.html
Joe Ben Hoyle & C.J. Skender (2016), Financial accounting, U of M Libraries Publishing. Retrieved from https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/BookDetail.aspx?bookId=4
...