Why Should We Evaluate on the Performance of the Fire officer? Does It Necessary?
Autor: Sara17 • April 15, 2018 • 1,714 Words (7 Pages) • 717 Views
...
5. What training program in fire officers may be trained for the fire officer in Poblacion, Pardo?
Statement of the Null Hypotheses
The following hyphothesis were teste at 0.05 level of significance.
Significance of the Study
The findings of this study will redound to the benefit especially on the people of barangay Pardo considering that this Assessment on the Performance of the Fire Officers plays an important role in the society. The greater demand of Fire Officers background justifies the need for more effective and life savers Fire Officers approaches. Thus, departments that apply the recommended approach derived from the results of this study will be able to train Fire Officers better. For the researcher, the study will help me in uncovering critical areas in the evaluation of the Fire Officers that other researchers were not able to explore.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Design
This quantitative study analyzed the evaluation on the fire officers in Barangay Pardo. The resulting findings add to the body of knowledge in these areas and contribute to curriculum development in leadership with the possibility of more good fire officers respondents.
Research Respondents
Research Environment
Research Instruments
Strategic Thinking Questionnaire
The STQ was designed to provide an assessment of three cognitive skills
important to strategic thinking: systems thinking, reframing and reflection.
Interpreting these cognitive skills helps test takers understand their own mental
processing, and whether they think flexibly, conceptually and strategically.
These questions are cast on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “Almost never”
to Almost Always (5). The higher the number, the greater the use of the
cognitive skill. The instrument takes approximately 15 to 20 minutes to complete
and can be scored manually or electronically. The STQ measures three cognitive
skills: Systems thinking, Reflection, and Reframing. Systems thinking. The
instrument was helpful to executives involved in leading organizations,
leadership development programs, and coaching and counseling (Pisapia &
Reyes-Guerra, 2007).
Systems thinking refers to leaders’ ability to see systems
holistically by understanding the properties, forces, patterns, and
interrelationships that shape the behaviors of the systems that provide options for
actions.
Reframing. Reframing is a conscious effort by leaders to switch attention
across multiple perspectives in order to generate new insights and options for
actions. The goal is to produce usable knowledge by rotating through appropriate
conceptual models for the activities and events observed.
Reflection. Reflection, in this study, refers to leaders’ ability to weave logical and
rational thinking together with experiential thinking through perceptions,
experience, and information to make judgments as to what has happened and
then create intuitive 53 principles that guide future actions. In reflection, one uses
perceptions, experience, and information to make judgments as to what has
happened in the past and is happening in the present to help guide their future
actions.
Research Procedures
Questionnaire
Part I.
Profile of the respondent
Directions: (Put check (/) the following items that suite you’re your information)
- Age give
20-25 years old
25-30 years old
30-35 years old
35-40years old
- Gender
Male
Female
- Civil status
Single
Married
Widow
Part II.
-Level of knowledge of the fire officer , as perceived to respond.
2.1 Level of Knowledge
More knowledgeable
Less knowledgeable
Don’t have knowledge
2.2 Level of Awareness
Fully aware
Less aware
Not aware
2.3 level of Competence
More competitive
Less competitive
Not competitive
Part III. Problems encountered by the fire officer , as perceived to respond in their efforts to extinguish fire which affects on their performance.
3.1 Tools
...