How Borderless Country Impact Political Sector

...

(Yiftachel, 2001a) states that “the region is still being debated in which ethnic groups and national competitive power, where they sought the implementation of self-government, where they display a high degree of spatial segregation, regional concentration and homogeneity territorial, and where they continue feel threatened by a national group "other", so that participatory forms of power sharing is not considered as a guarantee of their political rights or physical safety they want.”[1] I think the area is an important component of our personal, group and national identity, not only because the territory we are restricted by the limits fixed but because the region has a dimension of symbolic determine the attachment and affiliation to a particular room and places through the process of political socialization and territorial. It is precisely at the local level where territorial behavior several ethnic conflicts and national have a strong impact, because the competition is played through the practice of everyday life from a separate group that is in an urban environment that is different from their own, or in mono village of ethnic and towns.

The positive impact of globalization in the fields of politics, namely globalization developed at this time, has penetrated into every aspect of human life. Globalization impact at first fully owned by the State. However, gradually the sovereignty of the State was experiencing adjustment of global importance. Politics and government is the sovereign right of each State. State sovereignty starts from the relationship between the public until mengeksiskan resource needs in a country and the possibility of change of the concept of governance, but governance Other countries requires an attitude of openness, democracy, and respect for human rights. If the government is run in an honest, clean and dynamic will certainly get a positive response from the people. The positive response in the form of nationalism against the state to be increased.

State no longer regarded as a key holder in the development process. Public policy makers in developing countries take the road of development to address the social and economic. The strength of the relationship in the economic field between each pair as the market could depend on a number of factors, Including the geographical distance between them and the composition and size of Reviews their respective economies. But if the economic activity is not affected by political boundaries for example between Canada and the United States, the bond strength would not Rely on the fact that the two markets are located in different countries.

Evidence to the Contrary would mean that the border is important and that the two countries can not be Characterized as a truly integrated. Recent research has found that are relatively harmless US-Canada border have a significant economic effect. No evidence of two. First, the Canadian merchandise trade study revealed that the average Canadian provinces trade more with Canadian provinces other than the US state of the same economic size and geographical distance. Second, Also evidence comes from comparisons of consumer prices in the United States and Canada. If the U.S.-Canada border were economically irrelevant, there would be no large, persistent differences between the prices of identical products in the Canadian and U.S. markets, once they were Expressed in terms of the same currency. As every consumer has experienced firsthand, price differentials for the same good can and do exist at any single point in time.

Foreign policy is increasingly open to foreign capital participation in the national production played a role in the national economy increasingly dependent on global enterprise octopus system very sensitive to the risk of maintaining the country's stability. At the time of the order of reform appear to lead the process of national builders, the world economy is entering a century of computerization and digitization. Information technology and telecommunications turns later managed to change the order and patterns of production, trade and investment from multinationals and global enterprises. Globalization requires changes in setting trade and investment policies that give the space more freely in order to capital, technology and labor can move easily between the territorial sovereignty of the country.

Globalization enable people to connect, including the collaboration in the field of diplomatic with other countries. This is possible because of cooperation, both in trade and in politics are able to make our country known by other nations with more baik.dengan their visits and communications, either directly or indirectly, is able to strengthen the relationship between the two countries or more. So, if a State does not want alienated by the world community, we must be willing to open up so as not to fall behind in any case. Globalization allows to make countries more open to our economy and even in terms of ratifications to certain laws.

Increased Diplomatic Relations between States, the state agency level things being equal, cooperation among countries so more quickly and easily, increasing the resilience of politics, transparency, accountability and professionalism in the administration of the State more can the public spotlight, the increasing number of birth of political parties, LSM as a sponsor or channeling aspirations people. Besides politics can also cause the disintegration of the sovereign territory so that people will be summarily her for winning political party. Values ​​and political culture pursed to the need for common point of view in understanding the relationship between countries. The implication of each country reaffirms its national traditions in order to remain competitive in a global world. Cultural power state and nation will win the battle in this globalization. For that we need a strong combination between capitalism with democratic values ​​system of a country. Sovereignty democracy (understood as the power of the masses) to use the media as a mouthpiece defense party ideology. Party's own attempt to regulate the welfare of members of each party. For that we need a stable political stability.

Many discourse related to territorial conflict has focused on concrete and real dimensions of the territory of the State (size, shape, topography etc;) and its proximity to neighboring States as an explanatory factor for conflict under certain conditions. This is a deterministic approach that has overlooked an important symbolic dimension of territorial attachment experienced by residents of a certain region and, for whom, to the location of the border or the exploitation of resources. For example, the border between Indonesia and Malaysia is largely a protected forest