Perspectives on Industrial Relations

...

so that no group have complete power over others. Pluralistic employment relationship accommodates people with dissimilar goals, interests and desires, which separates them from one another. Although, the parties included have equal of authority and power to a degree that no individual group can control the others. This results in exempting employees from repression by their employers. On the other hand, management and employers shouldn’t presume to repress any employees beliefs or views that could conflict with the company targets. (Bray, Waring, & Cooper, 2011)

This structure of employment relationship essentially aims to combine conflicting judgements, aims and views, which therefore retains conflicts within significant and reasonable bounds. With this in mind, the conflicts may not, for any reason, demolish the organisation or impede with a companies goal attainment.

Another benefit is that it regards trade unions as suitable employee interest representatives (Rose, 2008). These unions are entitled to challenge the management or employer. Additionally, they also have the authority to find negotiations. This makes certain that conflicts, which are unavoidable in any work environment, are resolved and the anxious groups have a great working connection (Lewis, Thornhill & Saunders, 2003)

An example of a pluralist perspective company is the AAFP healthy care delivery systems. They believe that goals can be reached by using this approach to the organisation, financing and delivery of health care. This involves costs, competition built on quality and service.

One of the first noteworthy weakness of unitarist perspective is that is captures a small perception of the essence of industrial conflict. It tends to circumvent important questions involving conflicts over employment certainty, position of work as an elements of authority issues and production. An employment connection need to recognise the most intense structural sources of conflicts in a workforce. This proves unitarist as an impractical attitude that doesn’t acknowledge the causes of conflict (Rose, 2008).

Another weakness of unitarist form is the absence of understanding that there are authority imbalances between employees and employer which will cause various types of conflicts. Management frequently apply greater control over their workers in deciding work conditions rather than the employees acting as holders of control too, they usually just support the decisions of their employers and yield to their authority (Kessler and Purcell 2003: 315).

Additionally, conflict is handled too negatively, and not viewed as a strength that mirrors inequalities that can be applied for chances to recover cooperation in a workplace. (Dzimbiri 2008: 2, and Kitay & Marchington 1996: 1267)

As well as these strengths and weaknesses, Fox’s case is completely opposed to the unitarist perspective in organisations, declaring that it educates that there’s solely one centre and one interlay of obedience in the workplace, while in actuality, company’s are constructed of separate parties with different challenging interests. He noticed that different ways has to be viewed to discover to most successful way of controlling competition. Which is why a pluralist perspective is definitely the most successful approach. Fox also noted that managers needs to be completely aware of the variety of party inspirations, interests and aims to be able to attain continuing victory.

Conclusion

In this essay I have compared and contrasted the unitarist and pluralist perspectives along with evaluating the strengths of pluralist and the weaknesses of unitarist and discussed which perspective I feel, closely fits the world of work today.

By researching these two perspectives I know understand that both approaches have some strengths to provide to employees and their organisation. Nevertheless, it is clear that both perspectives biggest problems emerge when either abstraction is imbalanced within the company.

Alan fox’s frames of reference is clearly a very functional implement for managers, as it includes both employee and employer views to conflict, their interests and the position of trade unions as the effective changeable in the employment connect.

It sees that many of Alan Fox’s beliefs are still pertinent to todays workforce.

Bibliography

Fox, A. (1996), Industrial sociology and Industrial Relationsm Donovan commission Research No.3, HMSO, London.

Bray, M., Waring, P., & Cooper, R. ( 2011). Employment Relations. New York: McGraw-Hill Australia.

Rose, E. (2008). Employment Relations. New York: Financial Times Prentice Hall.

Lewis, P., Thornhill, A., & Saunders, M. (2003). Employee Relations: Understanding The Employment Relationship. New York: Financial Times Prentice Hall.

Kessler, I. and Purcell, J. (2003) ‘Individualism and collectivism in industrial relations.’ In Industrial relations: theory and practice. ed. P.K. Edwards. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing

Dzimbiri, L.B. (2008) Industrial relations in a developing society: the case of colonial, independent one-party and multiparty Malawi. Germany: Cuvillier Verlag

Unitary Perspective, Unitarism. 2015. Unitary Perspective, Unitarism. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.naukrihub.com/industrialrelations/unitary-perspective.html.

Analysis of Foxs Perspectives on Pluralism and Unitarism in Industry. 2015. Analysis of Foxs Perspectives on Pluralism and Unitarism in Industry. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.ukessays.com/essays/business/foxs-perspectives-on-pluralism-and-unitarism-in-industry-business-essay.php.

Communist Party of Ireland. 2015. Communist Party of Ireland. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.communistpartyofireland.ie/sv2010-04/06-marxist.html.

Analysis of Foxs Perspectives on Pluralism and Unitarism in Industry. 2015. Analysis of Foxs Perspectives on Pluralism and Unitarism in Industry. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.ukessays.com/essays/business/foxs-perspectives-on-pluralism-and-unitarism-in-industry-business-essay.php.

The Typed Gold: The unitary and pluralist perspectives of employee relations. 2015. The Typed Gold: The unitary and pluralist perspectives of employee relations. [ONLINE] Available at: http://yourpersonalresearchwriter.blogspot.ie/2010/12/unitary-and-pluralist-perspectives-of.html.

Employment Relations: Discuss the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Unitarist, Pluralist