Svm Asset Management Ltd Case Study

...

Another aspect in which these two companies greatly differ at is when it comes to the time span taken into consideration while undertaking the financial investment decisions for their clients. INVESCO perpetual widely embraces the aspect of long term thinking throughout its structure and operations. Despite the fact that the last one decade has posed a lot of challenges to the global financial management industry; all its UK equities teams have seemed to ignore day to day volatilities. Instead they seem to show a lot of interests in the identification of all fundamentally and investing in all the companies whose growth prospects is high. Major focus is therefore put on the probabilities of such upcoming companies growing and been able to generate high returns to all the shareholders in terms of dividends generation. This company therefore exhibits great focus and conviction and will tap the opportunity whenever it arises irrespective of the company sizes or the sectors such companies. On the other hand due to its risk averse nature SVM majorly concentrates its portfolios in the well known multinationals such as Apple and Shell. They tend to avoid the small and upcoming companies as they have perspective that degree of uncertainty is quite and thus any slight volatilities in the financial markets could result to such corporate falling. Inability of such small entities to pay dividends to their clients within the shorter durations of investments has also made them to shy away from putting their assets under their management.

Similarities between the two companies

Despite the fact that these two companies exhibit such great differences between the their backgrounds as well as performance; it is also very important to note that there are very many differences that they both share as financial management companies whose operations are majorly based in the in the UK. They carry out all their operations and investments and therefore these two companies have exhibited similar reactions towards the effects of the mutual funds holdings as well as bond yields. Both companies belief that during the periods of stress; concentration of holdings among mutual funds really does matter and has a very significant impact on the companies’ future prospects as far as returns are concerned. Since the economic depression of 2008 both these companies have greatly increased their mutual fund bond holdings and their concentration have risen somewhat.

Another major similarity between these two companies is the fact that the roles of their financial assets managers are similar. As we highlighted in the introduction section one of the major functions of the financial management companies is to undertake the investment decisions on behalf of their clients. Such actual activities are performed ant the implementation of the policies that are majorly formulated by the managers. The managers play the crucial roles of rebalancing the portfolios, analyzing the new investment opportunities that arise as well as all the risks that are often associated with them. One of the major factors that have played very crucial roles in the great success of these two companies in the financial management industry is the expertise of their managers in the accomplishment of all their investments duties. In this particular industry there is no game of chance for any sort of success. Instead the magnitude of success attained is directly proportional to the investment prowess of the managers as well as other key policy makers within the organizations.

Both companies also apply the same formulas in the determination of the fund flows. They both understand the importance of fund inflows for mutual fund investment and therefore have invested heavily in the necessary on the periodic analysis of the various UK as well as US based mutual funds as well as the ETFs of these funds on periodic basis. They both agree that funds actually increase whenever there is a good performance of the respective classes of the assets at question. The managers’ form both companies have therefore been reacting in similar manners in case of such occurrences to as to pursue momentum strategies and assign more funds to those classes of assets have portrayed some extend of consistency.

Comparison of their investment performance

.

[pic 1]

Figure 1: performance of INVESCO perpetual asset Management Company

The performance of the SVM as per the FTSE100 in various UK based markets is as show in the chart below. As it can be observed there are some portfolios indicated by the blue lines that are doing very well against the market trends which in this graphs are indicated by the red lines. We can therefore make a conclusion that generally the SVM Company is currently doing well as far as the performance of its portfolios in various markets is near the market averages as indicated in the graph below.

[pic 2]

Figure 2: performance of SVM asset Management Company

There are therefore only slight differences in the overall performance of these two companies as far as the general UK financial management.

Conclusion

From our above discussion is therefore very clear that financial management industry has been playing very crucial roles as far as the investments decisions are concerned. Financial managers are the major facilitators of these particular roles and their duties of determine the appropriate asset portfolio determine the actual success that the success that these investments eventually actualize into. For the individual as well as the institutional clients who aspire to make various investment decisions it important to analyze various organizations in the market in order to be ensure that they choose those that are more suitable for their investment needs. It is very important for the clients to be able to clearly understand the differences between Vanguard or Dimensional funds even before they make their choices regarding their most suitable financial management companies. Well the difference is quite simple as but it shouldn’t be ignored altogether has it does have its implications as well. The dimensional funds have a risk adjustment rate of return unlike the vanguard funds. There are various other factors that the concerned parties or rather the investors should take into consideration while choosing the most appropriate or rather reliable financial management companies. Such include the period of time the companies have been operational; this is