Frankestein

...

The conclusion of the essay is rather palpable though vexing since nature depicts that people are weak. Moreover, Science has rewards to those seeking for knowledge and quench to discoveries. As such, science may seduce scientists to a level that they lose their sense and ethics and step too far in their researcher as they gather knowledge. Stories such as Frankenstein depicts the capacity of scientific research and provide lessons to people. Science can go too far beyond the expected limits. The only way to control the limit is through regulations and awareness for people to discern and comprehend the costs of whatever is completed in surreptitious laboratories, hence becoming scientists with high standards and good morals.

‘

Works cited

Hockemeyer, Dirk, et al. "Genetic engineering of human pluripotent cells using TALE nucleases." Nature Biotechnology 29.8 (2011): 731-734.

Knaplund, Kristine S. "Assisted Reproductive Technology." (2014).

Miller, Susan. Shelley’s early fiction in relation to his poetics and his politics: an assessment. Not waiting to see the event of his victory. Diss. University of Glasgow, 2013.

Norris, Alison, et al. "Abortion stigma: a reconceptualization of constituents, causes, and consequences." Women's health issues 21.3 (2011): S49-S54.

Oppong, Steward Harrison. "Religion and identity." American International Journal of Contemporary Research 3.6 (2013): 10-16.

Shemma, Aviv, Roy Meirom, and Dov Greenbaum. "The Impact of the Humanities in Science and Technology Research: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Ethical, Social, and Legal Impacts of Science and Innovation." American Journal of Bioethics 14.4 (2016): 20-28.

Thomas, Wayne R. "The advent of recombinant allergens and allergen cloning." Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 127.4 (2011): 855-859.